Showing posts with label European Convention on Human Rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label European Convention on Human Rights. Show all posts

Sunday, 19 December 2010

Furious?

An Immigration and Asylum Tribunal have overturned a decision by the UK Border Agency to deport a failed asylum seeker who killed a 12-year-old girl in a hit and run incident before going on to commit other offences. The Tribunal said that because he fathered children in Britain, the decision of the UKBA was a breach of the European Convention on Human Rights.

It’s a great shame that the Home Secretary cannot order the UKBA to find this man and pop him on the first plane back home. At the very least, they should find a decent barrister and file an appeal.

David Cameron is said to be furious at the Tribunal’s decision. We are all furious!

Perhaps Parliament should reconsider which bits of the European Convention need to be rewritten or scratched out!
.

Friday, 31 July 2009

Compassion

.
The House of Lords has ruled in favour of Debbie Purdy, 46, suffering from progressive multiple sclerosis who sought confirmation that, under the terms of the European Convention on Human Rights, she had the right to choose how she died. The court also ordered that the Director of Public Prosecutions must prepare a policy covering cases where a spouse or partner travelled abroad to assist people with terminal illnesses to end their own lives.

The Law Lords decision will doubtless spark endless ethical and theological debate. Nonetheless, my view is that when someone has a painful terminal illness, they must be allowed - with the proper safeguards - to make their own decision about painlessly ending their physical and mental suffering.

Mrs Purdy may travel to Switzerland to end her life in a clinic where she will take a lethal dose of barbiturates prescribed by doctors at the controversial Dignitas organisation. Such a step requires enormous bravery and our hearts must go out to her and her family.

But the case raises the question as to why anyone should be forced to go to the expense of travelling abroad to put an end to their suffering when a similar compassionate service could be arranged in this country.

Certainly a debate on the issue is welcome, but the debate should include discussion as to what similar facilities could be provided in Britain.
.