Showing posts with label recycling. Show all posts
Showing posts with label recycling. Show all posts

Saturday, 15 January 2011

To The Door

Though I often feel in my mind that I am still in my twenties, age is undoubtedly catching up with me and, as I was reminded only recently by my other half, it will not be many years before I celebrate my seventieth birthday. So I can be forgiven for being of a generation that is perhaps more traditionalist in outlook than others.

Take milk for example, an essential commodity we all take for granted. In our house we still have it delivered in glass bottles to our front door by a milkman in his electric milk-float. I mention this because a few days ago, the 11th to be precise, happened to be the day in 1884 that one Dr. Hervey Thatcher, a New York inventor, came up with the first glass milk bottle which was sealed with a waxed-paper top.

Thatcher may have come up with the idea of glass milk bottle in the United States, but it was four years before that, in 1880, that the Express Dairy Company first started using glass milk bottles in this country.

By then most milk was pasteurised under a process invented in 1863 by Louis Pasteur which killed off harmful bacteria. And, in 1894, Anthony Hailwood, a North Country dairyman, pioneered the method of sterilising milk by heating it to high temperatures. Though most milk these days is pasteurised, some folk still prefer to use sterilised milk.

The shape of our milk bottles has hardly changed in my memory and as long as I can recall, they have always been capped by aluminium tops of different colours to represent their fat content.

While it is true that I cannot always recall what I had for lunch yesterday, I can recall the days when milk (and other things like coal and beer) were delivered by horse-drawn carts. When the milkman had his break, the horse had one as well and could usually be seen with a bag of feed hung from its collar as a midmorning snack. If you were lucky, the milkman might let you ride on the cart for a short while, often when the horse was slowly clip-clopping behind him as he rushed backwards and forwards and from house to house.

When horse-drawn milk-floats were replaced by electric ones, they were not quite so interesting. That is, unless you were being paid by the milkman to help on Saturday mornings when he not only had to deliver the milk but collect the week’s money as well, and you were allowed to occasionally drive the float. This, of course, was quite illegal but in those days no-one seemed to bother about a thirteen- or fourteen-year-old schoolboy driving a milk-float around the back streets of north London.

As I say, milk used to be delivered by a milkman and that is the way we still prefer it to arrive. It saves us the bother of carrying it, and milk bottles can be repeatedly cleaned, sterilised and reused and ultimately recycled into glass.

All you can say about the plastic-coated milk cartons that you have to heft from the supermarkets yourself is that they merely add to the ever-growing landfill sites and unnecessary waste I bang on about occasionally.
.

Wednesday, 19 May 2010

Stop Messing About With Trivia!

.
We have a bright and shiny new government and I’d like to think that one of the messages it ought to send out to local councils is: ‘Stop Messing About With Trivia!’

Every day we hear of the sort of council silliness that causes untold stress and unhappiness to the people involved.

Like the 95-year-old lady in Swansea who was threatened with legal action because, mistakenly, she put an empty butter tub in the wrong recycling bag. Or the great-grandmother who, while picking up her dog’s poo in a Houghton-le-Spring park, was pounced upon by two so-called environmental enforcement officers who claimed she had picked up the wrong dog’s mess and handed her a £50 fixed penalty notice.

Once other people started screaming about these incidents the councils concerned backtracked. And so they should. Officials ought to concentrate their efforts on more important issues than these.
.

Monday, 22 March 2010

It’s Good To Recycle!

.
Recycling seems to be a dominant theme this morning.

There is the report that a catamaran made of 12,000 plastic bottles, and appropriately named Plastiki, has set sail from San Francisco to Sydney to draw attention to plastic waste and the need for recycling. Powered by solar, wind and sea turbines, the voyage will pass the ‘Great Pacific Garbage Patch’, an area of waste said to be about five times the size of Britain. Good luck to them.

There is news of the gentleman in Argentina who has built a five-bedroomed house entirely out of recycled glass bottles. The task took him twenty years and used up six million bottles. His theme also is for the need to recycle, and good luck to him as well.

And now we now know that we can even recycle MPs, as witness the four, including three former cabinet ministers, who were caught in a ‘sting’ by Channel 4 and the Sunday Times. It is alleged that they demanded fees of up to £5,000 a day for acting as lobbyists to influence government policy even though Parliamentary rules prohibit sitting MPs from doing this.

Yes, it’s good to recycle!
.

Saturday, 19 September 2009

Sorrow On The Bosom Of The Earth

.
I was interested to learn that recently Westminster City Council threatened legal action against the distributors of free newspapers after it was found that they created four tons of waste a day. It seems that two of the publishers then agreed to meet some of the costs of recycling.

Our weekend papers now come with all sorts of supplements and inserts, most of which are discarded immediately. Perhaps I am one of the few that only read the news and, sometimes, the travel and book supplements, but all the rest are uninteresting rubbish to be put out with all the other stuff for recycling along with the two free newspapers we receive each week.

When you sit and think about it, we are inundated with paper we do not need and haven’t asked for every day. It’s not only the free newspapers, supplements and inserts but all the stuff we get by hand through the letterbox. We regularly get flyers from the local traders, supermarkets, Indian and Chinese restaurants and pizza parlours to name but a few, all of which go straight into the recycling bin without being read.

Royal Mail do their bit also to help our bulging recycling sacks, for they have for some time now been delivering flyers and commercial announcements along with the morning mail. And if you attempt to block these unwanted items you are told that this will also block unaddressed, and possibly important, notifications from the police and from the local council as well.

You have only to sit on a commuter or London Underground train after the morning rush hour to see the shambolic effect that all this free ‘stuff’ has on the carriages, for it all has to be collected up and taken away in rubbish sacks and dealt with.

So the stand of Westminster Council is a good one in my view. It is a move that other councils could follow suit and demand a contribution towards their waste collection and disposal. That would reduce unwanted paper and so help the environment that the government and others bang on about each day.

And couldn’t people that read all of the weekend papers along with their supplements and inserts from cover to cover pay more for the privilege? Or, better still, could I pay less for receiving less?

If the sacks of paper that my household put out each week is anything to go by, the sheer amount of unwanted paper being produced around the country - and the trees and other materials used to produce them - must be phenomenal.

Maybe, it’s time to do something about it and, in the process, help the environment.

As Shakespeare warns us in Richard II, act 3: ‘Make dust our paper, and with rainy eyes, write sorrow on the bosom of the earth.’
.