Showing posts with label Lib-Dems. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lib-Dems. Show all posts

Wednesday, 12 May 2010

Good Luck!

.
What a riveting day it was yesterday, ending all the speculation and culminating not only with a new Prime Minister but a new form of government.

The morning dawns with our new leaders, Tory and Lib-Dem, talking positively about the future with all bickering put aside in a general will to make this next government work for the good of the country.

Best of all, those now in charge have all been elected and we have seen an end to the ‘unelected and the unelectable’ trying to control the country from behind the scenes.

David Cameron and Nick Clegg have shown that parties can co-operate for the good of the country. The country deserves decent government for a change.

Good luck to them!
.

Tuesday, 11 May 2010

Get On With It!

.
So Gordon Brown has finally announced his resignation, and the country waits with bated breath to see which of the parties the Lib-Dems will get into bed with - and for how long such a relationship will last.

I suppose you can’t blame the Lib-Dems for trying to get the best deal for their party, but I do wish they’d speed things up. This interim period of ‘will they, won’t they’ is driving the nation crazy.

What I’d like to know is: was Gordon pushed, and do we really have to put up with him for another four months?

The one person that came out of yesterday’s political toing and froing with honour was David Cameron who offered Nick Clegg a referendum on proportional representation. Now we learn that Clegg could be dancing with Labour on Gordon Brown’s cynical promise of electoral reform legislation.

The Lib-Dems got a quarter of the votes; thus, three-quarters of the electorate don’t have views on electoral reform. Why then should we be subjected to legislation on it without first a referendum on the issue?
.

Sunday, 2 May 2010

It’s Been A Bad Week For Gordon

.
I suppose I can’t ignore the electioneering of the past week since all the newspapers are stuffed full of it, and the television channels have joined in with their collection of experts and pundits and daily opinion polls which jump up and down like the value of the pound to the dollar.

It’s been a bad week for Gordon Brown is the basic message, followed by speculation as to whether or not there will be a hung parliament between the Conservatives and Lib-Dem. This, in my view at any rate, may not be a bad thing since it might rein in the wildest of Tory ideas. There is also much merit in Nick Clegg’s oft-repeated plea to get the financial wizards of the three main parties together to sort the economy out. A bit of cross-party co-operation on other issues might not also come amiss.

But to return to the main story, one reviewed both by the columnists and the cartoonists this weekend. Gordon’s bad week.

I said earlier in the week that some of Gordon’s problems were brought about by the Labour party spin-doctors; the return to Gillian Duffy’s house to apologise in person for calling her a bigot was a case in point. Having telephoned her with an apology, he should have carried on with his campaign trail and not been deflected into what became a public humiliation for him. But ‘Duffygate’ derailed his campaign and ‘that woman’ has now confirmed she has thrown away her postal voting card despite a grovelling invitation to go to Number 10 for tea with Gordon and Sarah.

Of course, I should have said that most of Gordon’s problems were brought about by the Labour party spin-doctors. He was, after all, mainly following the scripts given him.

It has to be said that Gordon is not a natural television personality even though he sincerely believes in what he is fighting for. The accident which caused his blindness hasn’t helped his facial expressions and his Presbyterian upbringing probably suppresses any passion the man feels. Given this, the spin-doctors should have put him into situations where these two things didn’t matter though, to be truthful, I can’t think of any except for radio broadcasts where the studios were not monitored by television cameras to record every grimace or look of despair.

Then there was the line-up of senior party officials who, along with Gordon, all looked as glum as glum could possibly be, all photographed beneath posters which were of such insignificance that no-one remembers what they said. A scene made all the more bizarre when some hapless and distracted motorist crashed into the bus shelter nearby. Whatever message those posters were meant to convey was obliterated in a moment; the actual message received by the media was that Labour was crashing and the looks on the faces of their seniors showed just that.

Worst of all has been Gordon’s appearances at the ill-conceived leaders’ debates which have mainly distracted voters’ attentions from party policies to the performances of the three main personalities. How could Gordon have outshone the polish of the other two men? Gordon did his best to get across complicated financial figures and statistics but overdid them to the point where any memorable response to a question was obscured and, bizarrely smiling in the wrong places, he came across at times as decidedly odd. None of this helped his or the Labour cause and one assumes that some spin-doctors have been ‘spoken to’ subsequently. I guess too that the spin-doctors who suggested that a bronzed Tony Blair be parachuted in to make a couple of insignificant speeches realises now that this may not have been the best idea of the campaign so far either.

Labour was never going to be ultra-popular in this election. Thirteen years of Labour misrule have seen to that. Much of the odium for the past, and most certainly the current economic situation, falls on the shoulders of Gordon Brown and, sad to say, it is Gordon Brown who will lose this election for the Labour party.

I actually feel sorry for Gordon who I think has been very poorly served by the spin-doctors, though it has to be said that his initial cock-up for calling a Rochdale matron a bigot was entirely his own fault. Compared with the slick campaigns across the country by those advising Cameron and Clegg, that of the Labour party has been something of a shambles.

Is there any way of Labour surviving from this point? I can think of only one and, sadly for the man himself, that surely can only be Gordon’s speedy announcement that after this election he will stand down as leader of the party.
.

Saturday, 24 April 2010

The Forgotten Message

.
Most of the morning newspapers lead on the election and the chances of a hung parliament following Nick Clegg’s sudden rise in the popularity polls.

The Tory and Labour parties must now be bitterly regretting their agreement to the televised leaders’ debates. Until the first of these, the elections were primarily between the two main parties. After ninety minutes of debate it became clear that this election was now a three-horse race.

The leaders’ debates have also turned the election into a sort of Presidential race in which it has been forgotten that we are voting not for Clegg, Cameron or Brown but for our local man or woman, many of whom have served our local communities for years.

And this is a message that seems to have been forgotten as the three leaders slug it out in what has become something of a ridiculous personal popularity show.
.

Monday, 19 April 2010

Cleggmania?

.
Two stories dominate the morning papers: the ash cloud hovering over much of Europe and grounding airplanes, and the apparent growth in the support for Nick Clegg and the Lib-Dems.

Perhaps we are heading for a hung parliament but much can happen before we actually get to vote, and it is what happens on 6 May that will count not the current media hysteria.

Clegg did well during last week’s televised debate; so much so that many folk thought that the Lib-Dems were going to get Gordon Brown’s vote. But there are two more debates to follow, and Clegg is going to have to justify his stand on a number of sensitive issues - Trident, the euro, the EU, immigration and others. At the same time, Messrs Brown and Cameron are going to have to sharpen their acts if their parties are to make any progress.

On the other hand, perhaps a hung parliament might be good for the country for a few years since, if the Lib-Dems have the balance of power, then we might see some relief from the more extreme policies of the other two parties.

There are another two debates and another two weeks of politicking (groan!). But, whatever the polls, the pundits and the experts have to say on the subject, none of us will know for sure until the fat lady sings on 6 May!
.