Showing posts with label Parliament. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Parliament. Show all posts

Saturday, 12 February 2011

Proud

Now and again Parliament does the right thing.


For they have now shown two fingers to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg who were insisting that British prisoners should have the vote.


It does not matter in this instance what MPs voted on and I can’t say that I have any sympathy for British prisoners who, in punishment for their crimes, have temporarily lost their freedom. The point is that our elected representatives have upheld Britain’s sovereign right to make its own decisions by defying demands from an unelected body consisting in some parts of people with no conception of our own ancient laws.


This may well be the ‘one small step’ to our Parliament paying more attention to what Strasbourg wants in comparison to what we as a sovereign nation wants. If so, what happened the other night is a very good thing.

.

Saturday, 5 February 2011

Disgraced?

The wife of the Speaker of the House of Commons appeared in the Evening Standard supposedly wearing just a sheet in front of a hotel window with the Palace of Westminster in the background.

Subsequently she told a BBC Radio 5 Live interviewer that she was ‘probably stupid to do it’. She also confessed that because she is married to the Speaker, ‘... whatever I do is put in the media and used to get at him’.

The office of the Speaker is an ancient one and ranks in the order of precedence above all non-royal individuals except the Prime Minister, the Lord Chancellor, the Lord President of the Council along with some religious leaders.

Is it just possible that the Speaker’s wife disgraced this ancient office? I’d say there is no contest.
.

Saturday, 8 January 2011

Act I

The former MP David Chaytor has been jailed for eighteen months for falsifying his parliamentary expense claims.

He’s paid a very high price for submitting what turned out to be bogus invoices: disgrace, prison, exclusion from the party he served for many years, heavy court and legal costs and an uncertain future.

Sentencing, the judge commented that MPs ‘behaviour should be entirely honest if public confidence in the parliamentary system and the rule of law is to be maintained.’ There’s not much else to say after that.

Except, it must be remembered, this was just the first of the court cases pending concerning misuse of parliamentary expenses.
.

Tuesday, 13 July 2010

Spot On!

.
My admiration for Nick Clegg improves by the day.

It is reported that, just after the General Election results were known, he told Gordon Brown that, ‘... it is not possible to secure the legitimacy of a coalition and win a referendum unless you move on in a dignified way.' He apparently also said that the Labour party was 'knackered after 13 years in power’.

He got that right!

Monday, 31 May 2010

Not About Lady Godiva!

.
Now and again I look up some of the websites recording notable events on a day-by-day basis to see whether there is something interesting to chat about.

According to a number of websites, today is the day on which in 1678 Lady Godiva made her famous horse-ride though Coventry wearing just her long hair. I set about looking at some of the fables about this lady who, by her ride, persuaded her husband to remit some of the oppressive taxes he had levied on his tenants. I was going to ponder whether many of our lady MPs would do the same thing to relieve us of some of our tax burdens.

But it was a pointless exercise since I quickly found that Lady Godiva was, in fact, an 11th-century noblewoman and had been dead for over five hundred years by the date postulated by some of these websites.

I guess that the mistake was made by one website and then copied by some of the others. It demonstrated to me the need to check facts.

So as I couldn’t write about the Lady Godiva and her naked ride through Coventry, I looked around for something else to ponder on. In truth, there wasn’t much to interest me on another day dominated by politics, taxes, the economy and other such dire stories.

However, there was one; about Big Ben, the clock standing at the top of the 360-foot high St. Stephen’s Tower above the Houses of Parliament. For today is the day in 1859 when the clock struck the hours for the first time.

Big Ben featured large in my working life for one of its clock-faces could be seen from the flat we lived in after we got married, and I was to see it many times afterwards when working in London. For years I was to drive past it twice a day, checking my watch against it and noting when Parliament was sitting by the light atop its tower.

The original Palace of Westminster was destroyed by fire in 1834 and a new building was erected in the Perpendicular Gothic style. The architect was Charles Barry who was assisted by Augustus Pugin. Construction commenced in 1840 and continued for the next thirty years.

St. Stephen’s Tower was completed in 1859 and soon became known as Big Ben after its principal bell, a massive thing weighing 13.5 tons, cast by the Whitechapel Bell Foundry. Two months after it was first struck, the bell cracked and a lighter hammer was ultimately designed, the bell rotated and put back into use again three years later. Curiously, the bell was never repaired.

The clock itself was built by Dent & Co. to a design by a barrister and amateur horologer, Edmund Dennison, and the Astronomy Royal, Sir George Airy, and is renowned for its accuracy. Since it was put into service, it has suffered only one serious breakdown.

There are no conclusions to be drawn from this little essay, but I thought it might be interesting seeing that I couldn’t write about Lady Godiva!
.

Sunday, 30 May 2010

If Only ...

.
The Chief Treasury Secretary, David Laws, has fallen on his sword and resigned after been caught out fiddling the MPs expense system by renting rooms owned by his partner.

Perhaps, if Mr Laws had come clean over his expenses when other MPs were queuing up to regularise their own positions, all might have been well. But he did not and he has now paid the price for his failure.

It is a great shame for undoubtedly the new government has, for the moment at least, lost a first class brain.
.

Friday, 21 May 2010

Finding The Common Ground

.
Tragedy in Spain, continued unrest in Thailand, deteriorating relations between the two Koreas, violence in Karachi, strikes in Greece, a wobbling euro and planned strikes of British Airways cabin staff despite record losses for the airline. The morning newspapers don’t make for pleasant reading.

But at least our new coalition government is cracking on. Among other things, they’ve already scrapped the introduction of identity cards along with the next generation of biometric passports, and have suspended the useless Home Improvement Packs prior to them also being scrapped. The freezing of council tax for at least one year is good news.

Inevitably, there are moans and groans about this or that party abandoning or modifying some of its policies. But that is what coalition government is about - finding the common ground and, hopefully, sorting out the country’s economic problems in the process.

If in this process, a lot of other things get sorted out to the nation’s good, then I am all for it.
.

Wednesday, 12 May 2010

Good Luck!

.
What a riveting day it was yesterday, ending all the speculation and culminating not only with a new Prime Minister but a new form of government.

The morning dawns with our new leaders, Tory and Lib-Dem, talking positively about the future with all bickering put aside in a general will to make this next government work for the good of the country.

Best of all, those now in charge have all been elected and we have seen an end to the ‘unelected and the unelectable’ trying to control the country from behind the scenes.

David Cameron and Nick Clegg have shown that parties can co-operate for the good of the country. The country deserves decent government for a change.

Good luck to them!
.

Tuesday, 11 May 2010

Get On With It!

.
So Gordon Brown has finally announced his resignation, and the country waits with bated breath to see which of the parties the Lib-Dems will get into bed with - and for how long such a relationship will last.

I suppose you can’t blame the Lib-Dems for trying to get the best deal for their party, but I do wish they’d speed things up. This interim period of ‘will they, won’t they’ is driving the nation crazy.

What I’d like to know is: was Gordon pushed, and do we really have to put up with him for another four months?

The one person that came out of yesterday’s political toing and froing with honour was David Cameron who offered Nick Clegg a referendum on proportional representation. Now we learn that Clegg could be dancing with Labour on Gordon Brown’s cynical promise of electoral reform legislation.

The Lib-Dems got a quarter of the votes; thus, three-quarters of the electorate don’t have views on electoral reform. Why then should we be subjected to legislation on it without first a referendum on the issue?
.

Thursday, 6 May 2010

A Bright New Future For Some!

.
So at long, very long, last the politicking, lying, back-stabbing and shouting are all over and we will learn in the morning what the future holds for us.

I have no crystal ball but I would guess that the new government, whichever one it will be, will launch into a series of deep spending cuts that will hit every one of us.

On the other hand, we will see a new collection of bright and enthusiastic MPs all eager to sign up for their new salaries, expenses and other perks. They’re not going to be much hurt by the things they will be agreeing will affect us!
.

Tuesday, 30 March 2010

It’s Still Not A Bad Job!

.
After a seven month long inquiry, the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority has published its new rules governing MPs expenses.

In addition to their £65,000 annual salary, they will be able to employ one relative subject to ‘safeguards’, and claim £1,450 a month rent if they live more than 20 miles or one hour away from Westminster,

If the House sits after 11pm, they will be able to claim up to £15 for an evening meal and up to £80 to take a taxi home while others will be able to claim up to £130 to stay in a hotel overnight.

They will not be able to claim expenses without the proper receipts, and MPs will not be able to claim for mortgages. In future MPs will not be able to claim for first-class travel, and the golden ‘goodbyes’ are done away with.

It’s still not a bad job though is it?
.

Tuesday, 23 March 2010

Get It Over With!

.
That this parliament has been a rotten one is unquestionable and most right-thinking people will be glad to see the back of it.

With the exception of the Iraq war and the collapse of our banking system and the national debt that arose from it, this rotten parliament will stick in most people’s minds as being the one when many MPs were demonstrated to have had their snouts in the trough. It is the parliament that showed only too clearly that some MPs were more concerned with lining their own pockets than actually serving the people they had been elected to represent.

Four MPs, including three former cabinet ministers, have now been suspended from the Labour Party after the Channel 4 and Times ‘sting’ aired last night showed just how eager they were to accept fees varying from £1,000 to £5,000 per day to influence government policy.

The newspapers this morning have dug deep into the rich mine of information on both these four MPs as well as a few others.

Who’d have thought, for example, that Patricia Hewitt in addition to her parliamentary salary of £60,000 (plus expenses, remember!) earns an additional £280,000 a year in fees from companies she advises. Is she worth it I wonder, and will some of these companies want to retain her in future? Ms Hewitt is not the only one benefiting from external work and there is a list of MPs earning additional sums varying from £30,000 to £245,000.

We learn also this morning that a number of MPs have enjoyed expenses-paid junkets in various places abroad and failed to declare their interest by lobbying on behalf of those countries. Over 400 times! One MP is alleged to have breached the rules ninety times after making annual trips to Cyprus.

The expenses scandal trundles on unremittingly and most of us are getting thoroughly fed-up with hearing about it for it only reinforces just how out of touch some MPs are with the feelings of ordinary people.

The sooner Gordon Brown calls for a General Election the better. Then, hopefully, we can see the back of some of the grubby snouts that were in this very grubby parliamentary trough.

The question is though, will the next lot be any better?
.

Tuesday, 16 March 2010

Wise Words. Wise Deeds?

.
Every now and again my wife will produce some very wise and thought-provoking words.

We were out walking with our two dogs yesterday afternoon when she said, in relation to the raft of legislation this government has introduced, ‘Britain used to be the ‘Can Do’ country. Now it’s the ‘Can’t Do’ country’.

I mulled this over afterwards and realised that she was quite right.

In the days of Margaret ‘Do it my Way’ Thatcher, legislation was mainly about the big issues (even the dreaded poll tax which led to her ultimate fall was a big issue!). Of course we had strife, chiefly with the miners and the print unions, but the country - indeed, much of the world with the end of the Cold War - seemed to be surging forward most of the time. The Falklands conflict, seen as a just one by the British at any rate, produced a pride in Britain and our accomplishments. The union flag was seen on a variety of products as representing quality. Our standing in the world was high, and we had pride and self-esteem.

I suppose it all started to go downhill with the government of John ‘The Invisible Man’ Major who had to deal with the Gulf War, recession and the Maastricht Treaty. He was, alas, a grey man and the country seemed to descend into a sort of greyness.

Then along came Tony ‘Teflon’ Blair. He gained the Belfast Agreement and promoted devolution for Scotland and Wales, but got the country involved in unpopular wars in Kosovo, Afghanistan and, most notably, Iraq. The ancient law prohibiting ‘double jeopardy’ prosecutions in cases which had been tried was overturned. He reintroduced expensive local government for London which had been scrapped by Margaret Thatcher and, after the initial rapture following his election, the grey evolved into a sort of gloom.

And then Gordon ‘Bully Boy’ Brown appeared on the scene. Under him the gloom has most certainly deepened. We’ve had the Treaty of Lisbon (despite a promise of a referendum on the issue), the introduction of 42 days detention for terror suspects, parliamentary expenses scandals and national financial collapse. The motorist is overtaxed, and what few places are left for them to park their cars in are patrolled by aggressive traffic wardens or ‘Civil Enforcement Officers’ as they are now called. Our standing in the world has never been lower. What is left of the country’s self-esteem at the moment? Very little.

There is a feeling that the country is now overburdened with petty legislation, that some members of Parliament are corrupt even if not criminally so, that Parliament is incapable of regulating its members sensibly, that a government totally out of tune with the people has waged war against the motorist and has done very little for the ordinary man in the street. Indeed, we are now subject to more taxation and petty legislation than ever before. We are reported to be the country with the most surveillance cameras anywhere in the world, and latest regulations suggest that almost every citizen needs to have a Criminal Records Check for one reason or another.

Any new government, of whatever party, needs to lift this country out of its despondency, sort out immigration, deal with the national debt, take us out of expensive overseas conflicts and try to give us back our pride and self-esteem and our standing in the world. Most importantly, it needs to lighten the tax burden.

Wise words prompted this morning’s blog. Whether any of our politicians can come up with any wise words - and deeds - to sort this country out remains to be seen. But, at the moment, it seems highly unlikely from what I have heard so far.
.

Friday, 5 March 2010

A Hung Parliament?

.
A YouGov poll has found that the Tory lead in sixty Labour-held marginals had shrunk from seven to just two points over the past year which pundits say might indicate we are heading for a hung Parliament at the next General Election.

One problem the Conservatives face is identifying exactly what their major policies are and their recent conference didn’t do that for me. Less politicking and more direct communication might help them in my view.

On the other hand, I can’t say that I fully understand what policies are being proposed by the other parties either!
.

Saturday, 20 February 2010

Yes Please!

.
It is great news that the two writers of the BBC political sitcoms ‘Yes Minister’ and ‘Yes Prime Minister’ are to reunite and pen a play to be performed at the Chichester Festival in May.

Writers Sir Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn say that the play, ‘Yes Prime Minister’, will follow a tempestuous 48 hours in politics. They certainly have much background material to draw upon, that is for sure.

Actors David Haig and Henry Goodman will play the parts of Jim Hacker and Sir Humphrey Appleby, and seem to me to be superbly cast in characters originally made memorable by the late Sir Nigel Hawthorne and Paul Eddington.

The television and radio series ran between 1980 and 1988 and won a number of awards. It was a favourite programme in my household, and I still watch the hilarious programmes which, twenty-odd years later, still echo the political problems of today.

With a General Election looming, the following quote is as relevant now as it was all those years ago:

“Being an MP is a vast subsidised ego-trip. It’s a job that needs no qualifications, it has no compulsory hours of work, no performance standards, and provides a warm room, a telephone and subsidised meals to a bunch of self-important windbags and busybodies who suddenly find people taking them seriously because they've go the letters ‘MP’ after the their name.”

Let’s hope that the forthcoming play will be televised at some point!
.

Monday, 8 February 2010

Too Much Politicking - And In Advance!

.
Among many others, one thing that annoys me is the habit these days of politicians and government ministers shipping out in advance the text of the speeches they are going to give next day. If the public has the text of a speech a day in advance, there seems little point in any of these people actually bothering to deliver their speeches.

One such case was yesterday when the text of Gordon Brown’s speech to the King’s Fund about cancer care was published. And this morning, David Cameron’s PR people have publicised a speech he intends to give on those trying to avoid prosecution by claiming parliamentary privilege along with his intention to introduce a new law to cover the point.

This last seems to me to be unnecessary politicking for the sake of it and that is another of my pet hates.

Gordon Brown has made it quite clear that no-one is above the law, and his deputy has stated unequivocally that she is ‘completely satisfied’ that parliamentary privilege does not apply to cases such as theft or fraud. That ought to satisfy the most strident of voices but not it seems in David Cameron’s case.

I regret (almost) having to say that yet again I agree with Nick Clegg who, it is reported, will say: ‘Listening to the two of them anyone would think they were powerless backbenchers rather than the leaders of the two parties in Parliament which have proved to be the real roadblocks to reform. ... If they genuinely want political change, it is in their power to deliver it. So I challenge them to cut out the speeches and the rhetoric and get on with the job.’

He’s right again. On the other hand, this little speech was publicised in advance of him actually delivering it!
.

Sunday, 7 February 2010

Outraged? You Bet!

.
The media tell us that the leaders of our political parties fear public outrage over the news that the three MPs and one peer charged under the Theft Act yesterday over their expense claims may attempt to claim parliamentary privilege.

The media are darned, tooting right! Is there to be one law for us ordinary folk and another for the privileged folk in the two Houses?

Various politicians have urged those facing charges not to use parliamentary privilege to try to avoid court proceedings. This elite-club approach won’t do at all in my view. Either a judge or Parliament has to put these gentlemen right and get on with trials that will prove either their guilt or innocence.

The Liberal Democrat shadow leader of the House has made the most sensible proposal. ‘If there is any question about whether parliamentary privilege gives protection against prosecution for fraud, then Parliament should make it very clear by passing a resolution to say that it does not.’

He, of course, is right and Parliament should show some muscle for once and pass such a motion.
.

Friday, 5 February 2010

‘This Rotten Parliament!’

.
In 1648 Edward Sexby in expressing the mood of the ordinary people of Britain complained about the King and his ‘rotten Parliament’. The mood of the ordinary people, or more properly that of Oliver Cromwell and his associates, ultimately led to the execution of Charles I and to a new Parliamentary system.

362 years later the Leader of the Liberal Democrats, Nick Clegg, used exactly the same words when referring to the debacle of MPs expenses. He got that right!

Look at the newspapers today. We learn that over half of our MPs have been ordered to repay £1.1 million following Sir Thomas Legg’s review of their expense claims for the last five years. This morning, the Director of Public Prosecutions has announced that the Crown Prosecution Service will charge three MPs and one peer under the Theft Act.

This has been a Rotten Parliament. Not only for taking us into a needless war with Iraq, for allowing taxation to reach new levels, for allowing bankers to overreach themselves and so put the economy at risk and for ... the list is endless.

But above all, many of the MPs in this Rotten Parliament have shown that they have milked a ‘flawed’ expense system for all it is worth and, even now, they complain they have been unfairly treated. Those charged this morning have also raised the question as to whether they are covered by Parliamentary Privilege!

Some of the amounts to be repaid are trivial, like .35p for a cup of Horlicks claimed by a Tory MP. Other amounts are staggering, such as £42,458 to be repaid by a junior minister or the married couple of Tory MPs who managed to milk the system for £60,000.

It was the Daily Telegraph that first uncovered the scandal of MPs expenses and, despite objections from the then Speaker and Government seniors, it persisted. It was right to do so for if we cannot have trust in our MPs personal behaviour we cannot trust them for anything else.

MPs are meant to represent what Edward Sexby referred to as the ‘ordinary people of Britain’. It is to be hoped that those elected to the next Parliament will show that they can do so.

The words of Oliver Cromwell all those years ago when addressing the Long Parliament ring as true today as it did then.

‘Begone, you have sat here too long. It is time to give way to honester men!’
.

Monday, 7 December 2009

Why Bother?

.
This morning’s papers carry stories as to how ‘Bronco’ Brown proposes to save £12 billion over the next four years. The plans include ‘streamlining central government’ (whatever that means), cutting the civil service, getting rid of some quangos, etc., etc.

Having had these cuts announced in the papers, Brown then ‘announces’ them to at audience at the Royal Society.

Three questions arise in my mind.

Firstly, why has he bothered to make announcements to the good folk of the Royal Society? After all, we had only to look at our morning papers for this news.

Secondly, why doesn’t he tell Parliament what he proposes first rather than let his press department hand it out in advance?

Thirdly, and more important, why hasn’t he implemented these proposals years ago?
.

Friday, 20 November 2009

Care For The Elderly

.
I’m not sure what to make of Gordon Brown’s promise outlined in the Queen’s Speech to end means testing for care at home for the most vulnerable. On the face of it, the scheme is long overdue and, certainly, Brown calls it a ‘breakthrough’.

On the other hand, Labour peer Lord Lipsey says that the announcement was a gimmick which has bypassed proposals set out in a Green paper earlier this year.

The Tories say that the government will have to cut some disability benefits to fund the proposals and the government have yet to confirm or deny this.

As always with government, this one or another, the waters are muddied and only time will tell.
.